A research on evolution and creation

As a scientist, it is hard to discard tangible evidence that shows life has evolved across species. For example, the sequencing of human DNA, a consequence of the Human Genome project, has provided data which makes perfect sense within evolutionary theory.

Here religion is accommodated to science by having each of the six days of creation be not twenty-four hours but long periods of time — even thousands or millions of years.

The concepts of genetics and hereditary did not come along until later when introduced by Gregor Mendel, and later the study of evolution emerged with the discovery of DNA by Watson and Crick in Recently, however, the Center conducted a survey in which respondents were randomly assigned to be asked about evolution in one of two different ways.

Far too many high school and college biology courses fail to equip students to understand the scientific basis of evolution.

Creation vs evolution for youth

The exercise can be completed in 10 minutes or take a full class period. An individual who believes that evolution must be false may similarly support his or her position by pointing to the inability of biologists to prove a particular evolutionary scenario. Social and human factors play a role in the scientific enterprise, but this does not invalidate scientific conclusions. Scientific data, strictly interpreted, describe the natural realm—patterns and processes. It is important, therefore, to bring these misconceptions to light. However, some people in parts of the south and west of the United States, which had been influenced by the preachings of Christian fundamentalist evangelicals , rejected the theory as immoral. The difficulty for the ID movement is that it has failed to provide evidence that stands up to rigorous scrutiny.

So when biologists say that they have observed evolution, they mean that they have detected a change in the frequency of genes in a population. So why does thrombin suddenly start clipping bits off fibrinogen?

Consequently, defending the factual accuracy of the Bible becomes paramount.

evolution and religion

The Little Rock Ministerial Association supported Epperson's challenge, declaring, "to use the Bible to support an irrational and an archaic concept of static and undeveloping creation is not only to misunderstand the meaning of the Book of Genesis, but to do God and religion a disservice by making both enemies of scientific advancement and academic freedom".

Social and human factors play a role in the scientific enterprise, but this does not invalidate scientific conclusions.

Rated 7/10 based on 24 review
The Creation/Evolution Continuum